An image provided by citizen journalists shows Nusra Front rebels at an air base in Idlib. (courtesy NYT)

[Updated 29 Sept 2013 via Global Research]:

[Updated 18 Sept 2013]:

[Updated 29 Aug 2013] – An excellent article on how this is a false-flag operation, with the “rebel” forces the perpetrator’s of the attack (who, by the way are supported by our government)

[Updated 24 Aug 2013] – Both AFP and RT are reporting that the chemical attack was from the “rebels” and RT is reporting the Syrian Army has found the cache under Damascus in a “rebel” stronghold and is preparing to capture it.  Don’t look for this on MSM they are all screaming bomb Syria!

As I have written previously, there is ample proof of the U.S. creating false flag situations in Syria via their “Syrian Al Qaeda” forces to discredit the government of Syria:

The Lying Bastards and the lying lies they tell #2: The real story of Benghazi

Inconvenient Truth #42a: Don’t look behind that curtain…

Memory Hole: When you only remember the first thing you are told (The Traymseh “Massacre”)

Inconvenient Truth #36: The Houla Massacre as False Flag

Inconvenient Truth #35: When a picture is not what it seems

The latest attempt is reports that Syrian troops shelled the outskirts of Damascus with chemical weapons

The same usual suspects (U.S., U.K., Israel, Turkey, France) immediately, as in the past, say it is past time to nuke the Syrian government into non-existence.

However, a look back (via my posts above) tell the story that this is probably not what it seems.

Here is the first thing you should know:  On 29 January 2013, The Daily Mail in U.K. published a story titled “U.S. ‘backed plan to launch chemical weapon attack on Syria and blame it on Assad’s regime’ “.  This story was taken off the internet the next day but using the Internet Archive, we can view the story as it originally appeared HERE (archived by me HERE).

The story was “discredited” by MSM, but let’s see the roots of the story:

“British-based contractor Britam Defence discussed a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.”

But, thats not the real news.  A site called cyberwarnews (www.cyberwarnews.info) got copies of the hacked internal emails of the Britam Defence corporation and one of them revealed the above fully:

Phil

We’ve got a new offer. It’s about Syria again. Qataris propose an attractive deal and swear that the idea is approved by Washington.
We’ll have to deliver a CW to Homs, a Soviet origin g-shell from Libya similar to those that Assad should have.
They want us to deploy our Ukrainian personnel that should speak Russian and make a video record.
Frankly, I don’t think it’s a good idea but the sums proposed are enormous. Your opinion?

Kind regards

David

Additionally, in a folder on Iran activities, it is revealled:

The Iran folder contains heaps of operation plans of attack and defend as well as procedures for preventing or using chemical warfare  luring targets to kill zones, medical help, intelligence to the surrounding of operations and more. all together there appears to be 15 plans of operation.

Did you get that? “Procedures for…using chemical warfare…luring targets to kill zones..”

As further proof that this latest horrendous act is more than likely the work of our “AL-CIAEDA” forces in Syria (as they were in Libya), note the following on RT:

“The Russian Foreign Ministry, citing its sources, said that a homemade rocket carrying unidentified chemical substances had been launched from an area controlled by the opposition.

“A homemade rocket with a poisonous substance that has not been identified yet – one similar to the rocket used by terrorists on March 19 in Khan al-Assal – was fired early on August 21 [at Damascus suburbs] from a position occupied by the insurgents,” Lukashevich said. ”

Continuing, we read:

The Russian diplomat stated that it seems as though it was “a provocation planned in advance.” The “criminal action” near Damascus coincided with the beginning of UN experts’ work in Syria – which speaks in favor of such a conclusion.

Lukashevich pointed out that similar reports about Syrian authorities allegedly using chemical weapons have popped up before. However, the information has never been confirmed.

In Moscow’s view, the latest possible “provocation” might be the opposition’s attempt to get support from the UN Security Council and undermine the Geneva peace talks on Syria.

Please research this for yourself using posts I have referenced and make sure you understand what really is going on.  It is utter ignorance for Syria, who just agreed to let Inspectors in, would launch a large chemical attack.  However, given it’s recent past, it would make PERFECT sense for the Al-CIADA to launch an attack against people it has no interest in, to make it look like the “enemies” of the U.S. War Machine did it…

For what it’s worth, this video shows some definite staging: