Inconvenient Truth #99: Jerusalem Post – Israel giving medical aid to Nusra Front and Al Qaida

Original story from the Jerusalem Post HERE

Israeli hospital visit by Netanyahu, with ISIS/Nusra Front soldier being treated, and then released back to the Golan Heights.

Nusra Front is the Sunni Muslim al-Qaida offshoot which is currently fighting the Iranian-backed axis of Bashar Assad and Hezbollah in Syria.

Israeli soldiers stand atop tanks in the Golan Heights near Israel's border with Syria

Israeli soldiers stand atop tanks in the Golan Heights near Israel’s border with Syria Israeli soldiers stand atop tanks in the Golan Heights near Israel’s border with Syria. (photo credit:REUTERS)

Israel has opened its borders with Syria in order to provide medical treatment to Nusra Front and al-Qaida fighters wounded in the ongoing civil war, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The prominent American newspaper reported that Nusra Front, the Sunni Muslim al-Qaida offshoot which is currently fighting the Iranian-backed axis of Bashar Assad and Hezbollah, “hasn’t bothered Israel since seizing the border area last summer” along the Golan Heights.

While Israel views al-Qaida and its allies as enemies, it is far more disturbed by what it views as an even bigger menace – Iran and its proxies. According to The Wall Street Journal, this attitude has caused tension with the United States, which has also targeted al-Qaida and Nusra Front fighters in Syria.

Amos Yadlin, the former military intelligence chief who is currently in the running to be defense minister should the Zionist Union, led by Isaac Herzog, succeed in defeating incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the elections next week, told the Journal that Hezbollah and Iran “are the major threat to Israel, much more than the radical Sunni Islamists, who are also an enemy.”

“Those Sunni elements who control some two-thirds to 90% of the border on the Golan aren’t attacking Israel. This gives you some basis to think that they understand who is their real enemy – maybe it isn’t Israel,” Yadlin is quoted by The Wall Street Journal as saying.

The fact that the Israel-Syria border area along the Golan Heights has remained largely quiet has sparked accusations among supporters of embattled President Bashar Assad that the Sunni Islamist alliance, which includes al-Qaida, is backed by Israel.

“Some in Syria joke: ‘How can you say that al-Qaida doesn’t have an air force? They have the Israeli air force’,” Assad told Foreign Affairs magazine earlier this year. “They are supporting the rebels in Syria. It is very clear.”

Israel has denied actively aiding al-Qaida, though it makes no secret of its determination to thwart Hezbollah’s attempts to establish a foothold near the Golan frontier from whence it could harass the North.

Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon has stated repeatedly his contention that Iran is seeking to open a new front against Israel from the Syrian Golan Heights.

Earlier this year, an air strike attributed by international media reports to Israel struck and killed 12 Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps and Hezbollah operatives in Quneitra, Syria, near the Israeli border.

In retaliation, Hezbollah guerillas launched a missile attack near the Har Dov region straddling the Lebanon-Israel border weeks later, killing two Israeli soldiers.

Since the outbreak of the Syrian civil war, which has claimed the lives of upwards of 200,000 people, Israel has provided medical assistance to nearly 2,000 Syrians.

The Wall Street Journal quoted “an Israeli military official” who said that most of those treated were armed rebels fighting the regime.

“We don’t ask who they are, we don’t do any screening,” the official said. “Once the treatment is done, we take them back to the border and they go on their way.”

[end of story]

And of course, it’s not hard to believe Israel supports Nusra Front and Al Qaida, since John McCain has also been photographed with the LEADER of ISIS as recently as two years ago:

Neocon Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) had repeatedly been photographed in Syria with al-Baghdadi and other terrorists in June 2013, several months before ISIS was officially launched (al-Babhdadi is in the red circle)

Posted in Al Qaeda, Corruption, False Flag | Leave a comment

Inconvenient Truth #98: American Psychologists Association as torturers

In the following Washington Post Report, we learn that the American Psychological Association actively and deceptively colluded with the Pentagon and the CIA to allow psychologists to take part in torture. The report, which you can read HERE, clearly spells out that MK-ULTRA is alive and well, coming soon to “The Ministry of Love” in Amerika near you.

Report: American Psychological Association colluded with U.S. interrogation programs  (original story HERE)

Leaders of the American Psychological Association secretly collaborated with officials at the Pentagon and CIA to weaken the association’s ethical guidelines and allow psychologists to take part in coercive interrogation programs after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, according to a report released Friday.

The report contains the findings of an investigation led by a former federal prosecutor and appears to represent the most detailed examination to date of the complicity of psychologists in interrogation programs that at times relied on torture.

The probe concluded that the association’s ethics director and others had “colluded with important [Department of Defense] officials to have APA issue loose, high-level ethical guidelines that did not constrain” the Pentagon in its interrogation of terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The association’s “principal motive in doing so was to align APA and curry favor with DOD.”
The investigation also found that “current and former APA officials had very substantial interactions with the CIA in the 2001 to 2004 time period” when the agency was using waterboarding and other brutal measures to extract information from detainees.

In particular, a CIA contract psychologist with close ties to the association played a key role in “clearing the way” for a colleague, Jim Mitchell — widely considered one of the architects of the controversial interrogation program — to continue his involvement in it even after others in the agency had protested that his work was unethical. The report’s findings were first reported Friday by the New York Times.

The 542-page report was commissioned by the psychological association’s board of directors last year based on an investigation led by David H. Hoffman, who served as an assistant U.S. Attorney in Chicago from 1998 to 2005.

In a statement Friday, association officials expressed dismay at the report’s findings and indicated that the organization plans to adopt sweeping changes that could include banning psychologists from participating in the interrogation of people held in custody by military and intelligence authorities.
“The Hoffman report contains deeply disturbing findings that reveal previously unknown and troubling instances of collusion,” said Susan McDaniel, a member of an association independent review panel evaluating the report.

A second association official, Nadine Kaslow, said that “the actions, policies and the lack of independence from government influence described in the Hoffman report represented a failure to live up to our core values.”

An association official said that the organization’s long-standing ethics director, Stephen Behnke, had been removed from his position as a result of the report and signaled that other firings or sanctions could follow.

The document adds to an expanding list of damning assessments of one of the more controversial periods in recent U.S. history, including an exhaustive study issued by the Senate Intelligence Committee last year that accused the CIA of downplaying the brutality of its methods and exaggerating their results.
A Pentagon spokesman said the department was reviewing the report but offered no comment on it. A CIA spokesman said the agency had not been provided with a copy and therefore could not comment on it. He added that CIA medical personnel are dedicated to “upholding the highest standards of their health profession.”

The majority of the report is focused on the association’s relationship with the Pentagon and the department’s influence on a panel that the association had set up in 2005 to issue guidelines to psychologists after public revelations about the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq and psychologists’ involvement in interrogations.

Behnke and others engaged in “behind-the-scenes coordination” with U.S. Defense officials including Morgan Banks, the chief of psychological operations for the U.S. Army Special Operations Command and the head of the Army’s interrogation resistance training program at Fort Bragg.

The collusion was aimed at making sure the new panel adopted recommendations that “fell squarely in line with DOD’s goals” and would not prohibit psychologists from continuing their work at Guantanamo Bay.
The report found no evidence “that APA officials actually knew about the existence” of the CIA program, but noted that a longtime agency contractor and psychologist, Mel Gravitz, was enlisted to work with the association’s ethics panel.

Missy Ryan contributed to this report.

Posted in Al Qaeda, CIA, Corruption, Mind Control, MK-Ultra, Torture | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Inconvenient Truth #97: What Lincoln REALLY said about slaves

In the current climate of hysteria over the Confederate Battle Flag, It is always amusing to me that Republican’s are viewed as racists and Democrat’s as non-racist. (not that I give a damn about either party, they are all corrupt and have no desire to help us, the true slaves).  I guess 1984 “revisionist” thinking is a hallmark of the age we live in.  Most people do not understand that Lincoln, a Republican president, was the hero of the end of slavery.  And, that in the civil rights movement, it was the southern Democrats, not Republicans, by and large, that resisted the movement.

However, what hardly anyone ever truly understands is that Lincoln would not have freed the slaves if he thought it was possible not to.  In a letter, dated 22 Aug 1862 to Horace Greeley, President Lincoln made the following statement:

“…If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it…”

Mr. Lincoln’s primary objective was not to free the slaves, but to save the “Union”.   I.E., his primary objective was to keep the states that wanted to secede from doing so.  It is very informative that his Memorial shows him resting his hands on the Fasci, symbol of Governmental Control (it is where we get the term “Facism”):

“…The Italian term fascismo derives from fascio meaning a bundle of hay, ultimately from the Latin word fasces. This was the name given to political organizations in Italy known as fasci, groups similar to guilds or syndicates and at first applied mainly to organisations on the Left.  In 1919, in Milan, Mussolini founded the Fasci Italiani di Combattimento—which, in 1921, became the Partito Nazionale Fascista (National Fascist Party).  The Fascists came to associate the name with the ancient Roman fasces or fascio littorio—a bundle of rods tied around an axe, an ancient Roman symbol of the authority of the civic magistrate carried by his lictors, which could be used for corporal and capital punishment at his command…”

Definition of FASCISM”. Merriam-Webster. April 27, 2013.
Falasca-Zamponi, Simonetta, Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini’s Italy University of California Press (2000), p.95
Johnston, Peter (April 12, 2013). “The Rule of Law: Symbols of Power”. The Keating Center. Oklahoma Wesleyan University.
Watkins, Tom (2013). “Policing Rome: Maintaining Order in Fact and Fiction”. Fictional Rome. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey.
New World, Websters (2005). Webster’s II New College Dictionary. Houghton Mifflin Reference Books. ISBN 0-618-39601-2.
Payne, Stanley (1995). A History of Fascism, 1914–45. University of Wisconsin Press. ISBN 0-299-14874-2.
Lincoln Memorial Washington DC

Lincoln Memorial Washington DC showing Fasci as symbol of corporal and capital authority; i.e., FACISM.

FASCI symbol, on our Dime, used by Mussolini and his FACIST party in WWII. The symbol represents FACISM, which our government represents.

Same symbols on either side of the flag, representing the type of government we have. Note the axe head on the top, the exact symbol used by FACISTS.

Everything that happened in the Civil War happened (from his viewpoint) to keep the South from seceding, plain and simple.

Here is the full text of his letter, which you can read on the New York Times website:

A LETTER FROM PRESIDENT LINCOLN.; Reply to Horace Greeley. Slavery and the Union The Restoration of the Union the Paramount Object.
Published: August 24, 1862

WASHINGTON, Aug. 22, 1862.

Hon. Horace Greeley:

DEAR SIR: I have just read yours of the 19th, addressed to myself through the New-York Tribune. If there be in it any statements or assumptions of fact which I may know to be erroneous, I do not now and here controvert them. If there be in it any inferences which I may believe to be falsely drawn, I do not now and here argue against them. If there be perceptible in it an impatient and dictatorial tone, I waive it in deference to an old friend, whose heart I have always supposed to be right.

As to the policy I “seem to be pursuing,” as you say, I have not meant to leave any one in doubt.

I would save the Union. I would save it the shortest way under the Constitution. The sooner the national authority can be restored the nearer the Union will be “the Union as it was.” If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time save Slavery, I do not agree with them. If there be those who would not save the Union unless they could at the same time destroy Slavery, I do not agree with them. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or destroy Slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. What I do about Slavery and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save this Union, and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause. I shall try to correct errors when shown to be errors; and I shall adopt new views so fast as they shall appear to be true views. I have here stated my purpose according to my view of official duty, and I intend no modification of my oft-expressed personal wish that all men, everywhere, could be free. Yours,


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Inconvenient Truth #96: The Real Story behind Bin Laden’s Death

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment